CRAWFORD COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT

GENERAL DIVISION

Schedule for protection order COURTroom

Week BEGINNING:  may 20, 2013

(pLEASE NOTE THAT THIS SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE)

Courtroom is located at the Crawford County Courthouse, 2nd Floor.

Please check in with the Bailiff when arriving for your court hearing.

COMMON PLEAS JUDGE: RUSSELL B. WISEMAN

PROTECTION ORDER MAGISTRATE: ROBERT CLARK NEFF, JR.

SCHEDULE UPDATED AS OF: Thursday, May 16, 2013 at 11:00a

Monday, May 20, 2013

Time

Case Caption

Case No.

Hearing Type

Legal Counsel

9:00a

Peterman, Michelle vs. Rossman, Belinda

13-CV-0130

Full Hearing on Civil Stalking Protection Order

Petitioner: Pro Se

Respondent:

9:30a

Peterman, Michelle vs. Warren, Harry

13-CV-0131

Full Hearing on Civil Stalking Protection Order

Petitioner: Pro Se

Respondent:

10:00a

Krietemeyer, Michelle S. vs. Krietemeyer, Michael K.

13-DR-0023

Full Hearing on Civil Protection Order

Petitioner: Jefferey Stiffler

Respondent: Patrick Murphy

11:00a

Brocklesby, Jessica M. vs. Hetsler, Matthew David

13-DR-0097

Full Hearing on Civil Protection Order

Petitioner: Pro Se

Respondent:

 

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Time

Case Caption

Case No.

Hearing Type

Legal Counsel

9:00a

Reed, Cindy vs. Stitzel, Karl

13-DR-0064

Full Hearing on Civil Protection Order

Petitioner: Geoffrey Stoll

Respondent: Raymond Fesmier

AND

Stitzel, Karl E. vs. Reed, Cindy E.

13-DR-0070

Full Hearing on Civil Protection Order

Petitioner: Raymond Fesmier

Respondent: Geoffrey Stoll

10:00a

Slaughter, Loretha vs. Quaintance, Daniel L.

13-CV-0137

Full Hearing on Civil Stalking Protection Order

Petitioner: Pro Se

Respondent: Brian Gernert

10:30a

Rodriguez, Marla vs. Kaple, Greg

12-CV-0375

Full Hearing on Civil Stalking Protection Order

Petitioner: Pro Se

Respondent: James VanEerten

 

Friday, May 24, 2013

Time

Case Caption

Case No.

Hearing Type

Legal Counsel

9:00a

Trammell, Sarah vs. Trammell, Kenneth

12-DR-0286

Civil Protection Order Review Hearing

Petitioner: Pro Se

Respondent: Sebastian Berger